🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the moment for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.